beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro 250 ohm Over-Ear Studio Headphones For Mixing, Mastering, and Editing

7 reviews for beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro 250 ohm Over-Ear Studio Headphones For Mixing, Mastering, and Editing

1. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   Heretic817 – January 7, 2016

   
   EDIT: After a comment by another user I looked at my review and found that perhaps there were some points of seeming ambiguity that I had not intended. So, I made a second pass to clear up my stance on a few things. While I do not consider myself an audiophile I do like a good pair of headphones. The DT990 250ohm is a very nice set. I currently own Senns. HD558’s, AT-M50’s, AKG Q701’s, and the DT990 Pros’. I also own an Objective 2 Amp. As an aside If you want/need an affordable headphone amp I highly recommend the O2 and JDS is an excellent supplier. The price at JDS has also dropped a bit over time and at present it’s a steal at about $130. I can’t recommend it highly enough. I have never tried it, though I plan to, but the Magni 2 by Schiit by all accounts is another very solid budget performer.NOTICE: I have a particular character flaw. If I go to spend more than $100 on a luxury item I obsess over it for an unnatural amount of time. I read every review at every site twice. I dwell on it for weeks on end. Then I try one out, return it and try something else. It’s borderline to being a named disease. The point is I only write a review if I think that what I landed on is a great value or if I am disappointed in all of the effort and thought that went into the purchase.That, in a nutshell, is what I look for. Best bang for buck not just bragging rights. I think that the difference between $40 cans and $150 cans is HUGE but the difference between $150 cans and $650 is deep into the territory of diminishing returns. I have listened to some expensive setups and my impression was…yeah well MAYBE it sounds a little bit better but not THAT much better. certainly not twice as good. Not even close. It’s more like a 5% – 10% gain for a 300% price increase. This is the perspective that this review is based on. Each headphone has its own strengths and weaknesses and serves different purposes. I did tons of research before purchasing each one and I bought each one to fill a different niche. In some cases I tried out a few sets that I returned before landing on the ones that I have now. Each headphone that I currently own I am very satisfied with.However, I have never heard of the one headphone to rule them all. That would need to have perfect freq. response, incredible sound-stage and detail, isolation, super comfy and breathable, perfect for travel, and able to be driven by even wimpy sources . It does not exist man. Not at any price. I am more into having situational variety and the best bang for buck. I think each of these sets are solid choices at their price point for a particular set of needs. I can wholeheartedly recommended each one for their respective niche. Similarly, I own a gas grill, a charcoal grill and a smoker. None of them does everything perfectly but each accomplishes a specific task exceptionally well. Get it? Cool.So, where do the DT990’s fit in?Power Requirements: It is worth noting that the 990’s listed here are 250 ohms but there are other flavors. 250 ohms all but mandates an amp. To my knowledge the Limited Edition all black ones are only available in 250 ohms. There are variants to the 990 that come as low as 32 ohm and as high as 600 ohm. If you go for the 32 ohm an amp should not be a necessity.Construction:Very solid with a minor quibble. As near as I can tell there is one solid piece of spring steel for the headband that attaches to both ear-cups. The ear-cups are plastic but of the thick and sturdy variety. The cover on the headband is nice and squishy and has button snaps. So, it looks easy to replace if damaged. All the materials seem to be of great quality for a set at this price. Ear-pads are velour which is by far my very favorite option for ear-pads.Also, the DT990 are a very long lived and well loved set. The mfg. claims that nearly all parts are easily obtained and replaceable. Even though the upfront cost is more than some other options you can sleep well knowing that your set should last you many years to come.My one reservation is that it is not clear to me if the cord is replaceable. It has a standard strain relief. I have not searched or asked the mfg. about it. If it is indeed not replaceable, this might be cause for concern.Comfort:Nice. I have a close shaved haircut but I barely notice the headband. Open sets with velour ear-pads breath and rarely get hot and sweaty. I have a smaller head than some humans. The clamping force is maybe one concern. For me it’s just fine. If you have a large meaty head it is possible the clamp may be a bit much. The good news is that the spring-steel is fairly yielding and should be in no danger of losing shape over time.Sound-stage: It is a very open sounding set. It’s not on par with say AKG Q701’s or the legendary AD700’s but the DT990’s offer a very respectable sound-stage of their own. Separation and positioning are very good. This makes the 990 a nice option for gaming just not the “best” option for competitive “sound whoring”. (Pardon the phrase, I did not invent it)Sonic Profile:This is a matter of taste of course but I am going to list it as a big plus for me. The DT990 has a sort of V shaped sound profile.There is some emphasis on both lows (bass) and highs (treble) with slightly recessed mids. This set makes no excuses for not being a neutral set but it pulls off an interesting feat. Open sets usually have weaker bass. So, the 990’s crank it up a notch. The result is an open can with some punch.It also has great clarity of high frequencies thanks to the 990’s slight emphasis on treble and open back. If all you want are X-Ray ears for online shooters you are better served with Q701’s or the famous AD-700’s. Compared to those options the DT990’s represent a trade off of slightly less clarity and sound stage for a MUCH more satisfying bass response.Recommended for:Solo listening: Open design offers no real isolation but when alone I will take the sound-stage of an open set any day of the week.Non-competitive gaming: Sonic profile is a lot of “fun” and sound-stage is great with Dolby or CMSS. If competitive gaming is ALL you want maybe get the AD700’s instead.Bassy music tracks: Rap/Hip-Hop, DnB, Dubstep…etc. The “fun” sound of these cans offer a really great mix of traits for an open set. The 990’s may not be neutral but when paired with material to match its strengths the rewards are great.Not Recommended for:Privacy: You may bothers others in the room because of leaking sounds.Travel: See above. Just forget about work or airplanes. They do not fold up or lay flat on the chest when taken around the neck like “DJ” headphones. Plus they all but require an amp with decent power. This is a set for at home.Movies/TV: Again, this is an open set geared for “fun”. If you want neutral/accurate reproduction this is maybe not the best set.A WORD ABOUT GAMING HEADPHONES I love to game. At least in part, my choices in headphones came by way of the massive review guide by a user called Mad Lust Envy over at Head-Fi. As far as a resource for headphone reviews revolving around gaming his sticky thread over at Head-Fi should be listed as a National Treasure. I would be remiss not give him a shoutout. If you are interested in gaming headphones and have not heard of the Mad Lust Envy Thread over at Head-Fi I strongly recommend a visit. Just be careful. The motto over there is something like “Welcome to Head-Fi! Sorry about your wallet.”If you want to make a headset out of your headphones you could do a lot worse than the Antlion Mod-Mic. It has a magnetic mount. You can put magnetic mounts on more than one headphone allowing a lot of flexibility. It also works better than most dedicated headset mics. There is also a good cheaper option form Zalman.*Comparisons may be useful to those who are considering one of the other sets that I own. So, here it goes…*COMPARISONS:DT990 vs. AT-M50: The M50’s are a DJ Headphone that can be taken down around the neck and the cups will lay flat on your chest. M50’s are closed back, do not leak much sound, they are easy to drive. The Bass is controlled and deep but not too muddy or overly intrusive. True Bass Heads that really just want their teeth to rattle may not be satisfied but I find them to be a real joy for Drum n’ Bass, Dub Step or Rap/Hip Hop Tracks. That being said it is a closed back headphone and while the sound stage is not bad for a closed back, it is also not ideal for nit picking finer details in competitive games. Take all of these traits as a whole and what you have is my go-to cans for travel or when I don’t want to bother others in the room with what I am listening to. The 990’s being open and power hungry (more on this later) are no good as portable cans. Where they impress is the fact that they have almost as much of a “fun” bass response as the M-50’s. In open cans this is not typical. Being open and able to dig deep in bass is one of the traits that makes non-competitive gaming with 990’s just awesome. They have great bass response in an open design with better sound stage and detail retrieval. If I am alone at home I reach for the 990”s over the M50’s. On the road or with the wife in the room it’s the exact opposite.DT990 vs. Q701: Q701’s are renowned for having a very wide open sound stage and high degree of clarity in the mids and highs. They are equally known for lacking in the bass department. Bass Heads need not apply. They are great for “detail whoring” in competitive online games or listening to fine details in less bass heavy music. X-Ray ears. The sound stage is truly a standout in this set but again many will left wanting for more bass. Also, a very comfy and well crafted set. The DT990 stacks up quite well against the strong points of the Q701. They are very open though not quite on the same level of the sound stage of the Q701. Though it does put up an admirably large sound stage of its own. Both sets are comfort kings. The 990’s may have less detail and sound-stage but the bass is much better.DT990 vs. HD558:The 558’s are comfy and open and have nice velour pads. They are more like semi-open. They have a good soundstage. The clarity across the spectrum is good with clear mids and highs and nice punchy bass that can get satisfyingly deep but not overly boomy. This is the most neutral of my sets. They are also a low impedance can that is easy to drive and at about $150 they are a very easy set to recommend. I hope you are picking up that I really like the HD558’s because for the price (IMHO) they are a solid all-rounder that won’t break the bank. This is my go to set for movies and TV.The 990’s sound-stage is improved over the 558’s and by my estimation positioning in is also a bit better. As noted the Freq. response is more V-shaped in the 990’s. The 558’s are more neutral and the 990’s are more “fun”. So, the bass digs a bit deeper and the highs are a bit more detailed though the mids are slightly recessed. The 558’s and 990’s don’t come different worlds the way that the M50’s and Q701’s do. Detail retrieval is very good. The 990’s are a 250 ohm headphone and some sort of amp is pretty much mandatory. Depending on the source you may be able to drive them to a listenable level but a power starved driver will not respond the way it is meant to and the results will be underwhelming. The same is true of the Q701’s.Also, the materials and craftsmanship of the DT990 are noticeably more solid than the 558’s. I’m not saying the 558’s feel cheap, they do not, but the 990’s are clearly built to last. In closing: Take all of this with a grain of salt. This is all very subjective and your mileage may vary. You might try something and not feel the same way about it. There is no accounting for taste. I hope that at least someone out there was helped by this review. If you have any specific questions about one of these headphones I would be happy to share my thoughts if you care to hear them.Happy listening,-Heretic

2. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   S. Lee – March 28, 2012

   
   *UPDATE*As promised, I wanted to come back and let you all know what I thought of these cans after some burn-in. I didn’t use white noise or anything special. I just left my cans connected to my AMP playing music from my computer on random at high volume. When I went to work or sleep, I would leave these playing. So….drumroll: did the burn-in make any difference? YES! A resounding YES! As you read on to my original review, you will know that I love crisp clear highs. But even for me, these headphones were a bit fatiguing initially. There was a bit of a “shattering” effect from the highs. Which I really like, but can tire your ears out very quickly. After about 300 hours of burn-in, these cans have really hit their stride. The highs are still EXCEPTIONALLY clear. I can still hear the squeak when a finger drags over a fret. I can still hear every string during an acoustic strum. The softening of the highs didn’t steal anything from the clarity. The burn-in allows me to listen for a couple of hours without aural fatigue.Also, I’ve had a chance to use these cans using a multitude of amps. They sound fabulous using my Yamaha speaker amp/receiver. They sound great using a good headphone amp. Fiios E17 or E7/9 is probably the minimum I’d recommend. In a nutshell, these things are thirsty for power. And although they sound good without proper amperage, these cans scale beautifully when provided juice. In a nutshell, these cans thirst power, and the more you give it, the more these cans respond. Please consider this when purchasing. If you don’t have a dac/amp setup or a speaker receiver with a good headphonen port, then make sure you budget for it…or plan to purchase one down the road. An already 5 star review has now become a 5 star review with an exclamation mark. ENJOY!*ORIGINAL REVIEW*I just received these headphones today, so keep in mind that these cans haven’t been burned in yet. Generally a high end headphone requires about 100+ hours to burn in properly. John Grado of Grado headphones says 50 hours is a good burn in time. Others say the AKG 701/702 require about 300 hours to burn in properly. But 100 hours is widely held as the norm. I was going to wait to write the review, but they sounded so good right out of the box that I couldn’t wait to write a review. I will update after about 6 months of use, so come back if this review doesn’t convince you to “add to cart”. I’ll see if these headphones have a tonal softening after some burn in.What’s in the package: Nothing but the headphones. You get the headphones with the 3.5mm jack and 1/4″ screw on adapter. Both ends are gold plated.Okay, now that I’ve got that over with, I’ll get to the meat and bones of the review, the sound–and how glorious they sound. I figured the best way to test the dynamic range and audio quality of the music was to pick a handful of songs that highlight a certain instrument or frequency range. So I’ll reflect on my impressions from the various songs I chose to test out the fidelity of these headphones.Billy Jean(Michael Jackson) – Michael Jackson stated that he wanted to write a song with a great bass-line, and into the studio he went with Quincy Jones. The product of this inspiration and the collaboration was Billy Jean. The quintessential MJ song. I chose this song specifically to test the clarity of the lower freqs. WOW. The bass is deep and clear. Each bass note has it’s own presence. The notes don’t slur/blend into each other. There is a discernible transition from note to note. EXACTLY what I was hoping for.Getting in Tune(The Who) – Subjectively speaking, I think John Entwistle was the greatest bassist of all time. To test the speed of the bass, I chose this song because no one played the bass quite like Mr. Entwistle. Whereas Billy Jean is a slow bass-rift, Getting in Tune is classic John Entwistle and the bass notes fly all over the place rapidly. These cans keep up with the amazing fingers of John Entwistle without breaking a sweat. And as was the case with Billy Jean, each note has its own distinct presence. Open headphones usually aren’t the best for exhibiting the lower freqs, but these are amazing.In the Air Tonight(Phil Collins) – I wanted to see how these cans handled drums. And if you want to go to drums, what is better than the opening drum rift in this song? Does it have the anger of a John Bonham or the craziness of Keith Moon? No, but it has the unrivaled coolness. Drums are a dynamic instrument tha covers almost the entire frequency gamut. So Drums are actually one of the best instruments to test a set of cans. Like everything else I’ve heard through these things, the drums are AMAZING. From the banging of the sticks, to the stomp of the bass drum, and the crash of the hi-hat these cans magically reproduce the energy that Phil Collins brings to this song.Leather and Lace(Stevie Nicks & Don Henley) – I chose this song for two reasons: the vocal mastery of the two singers; and the amazing acoustic guitar play. With a lot of lesser cans, Stevie Nicks young voice comes off squeaky. With these, the multiple layers of her brilliant voice all comes through. The youthful highs and the textured lows of her voice are all on display. Don Henley’s raspy highs are depicted with amazing honesty. This song is perfect for highlighting two very distinct singing styles. And when they harmonize? you can cleary hear each singer distinct from the other. The acoustic guitar is just unbelievable through these cans. I can hear every string from each strum of the pick. Often times a strum will sound like 1 note, but I can actually hear all 6 strings separately. If you never heard this effect before, you are missing out.Mr. Know It All(Kelly Clarkson) – I picked this song because Kelly Clarkson has one of the best voices going today, and because it is a modern pop/rock song with modern production value. Whereas the other songs kept gaps in the frequency range, this song presents a wall of music effect. By this, I mean that almost the entire frequency range is ALWAYS present. The bass-line isn’t as distinctive as was the case with Billy Jean and Getting in Tune, but that is such the way of newer songs. The bass-line is a ever-present steamroller. Now this isn’t a bad thing. These cans allow the bass to maintain its ever-presence while still allowing the mid-range and highs to co-exist. Kelly Clarkson’s powerful voice doesn’t get drowned out. With amazing clarity, every layer, every tone, every break in her voice sound AMAZING.Piano Concerto No. 1(Tchaikovsky – performed by Ivo Pogorelich) – This is my favorite classical piece. This is also my favorite rendition of this piece. Ivo Pogorelich takes a lot of artistic freedom in his interpretations, and this song is no exception. His piano performance is imperfectly perfect. I know that’s an oxy-moron, but because he chooses to play it the way he feels, the emotional impact to the listener is that much greater. So you can imagine my disappointment when this version of the song was unbearable with these cans. I am a bit torn when it comes to hi-fidelity and classical music. You almost ALWAYS get static. I don’t care whether you have a HD-audio or FLAC copy, it is the nature of the recording methods. The best performances are usually live, and you are going to get static in a live recording environment. So although every instrument is distinct and the sound-stage vast, the static is just too much of a distraction. The better the headphones or speakers, the more static you will get. So I was forced to play a different version of the same piece–the Martha Argerich version which has a lot less static. Her rendition is textbook. She plays it as Tchaikovsky wrote it. She is technically one of the finest pianists EVER. This version has a lot less static, but there still is static nonetheless. This version allowed me to focus a bit more on the instruments. When someone hammers the ivory, often times you will hear the reverberations and echo inside the piano box. And these are the first cans I’ve listened to that reproduce this effect as realistically. You can hear the horse hairs sliding across the strings. Just an amazing set of cans for classical music, but you have to make sure you have the best recordings or else the static will ruin your listening experience. This is no gig on the cans, it is a gig on the recording methods. So you may not be able to enjoy your favorite pieces unless you find a flawless version of it. I would say about 90% of my classical collection is adversely effected by the poor recordings and are thus rendered unlistenable with these cans ability to reveal every flaw.Hate it or Love it (50 Cent – G UNIT version) – I love this song. And you can’t do a current headphone review without including a hip-hop song. So why not pick my favorite? A good set of hip-hop cans will get your head bobbing and your fingers snapping. You won’t even realize you are doing this. It’s why hip-hop is such a good genre of music for clubs. These headphones are almost too precise for hip-hop. I am so amazed by how great they sound, I find myself listening to the intricacies of every note that I don’t find myself bobbing and weaving. If headphones can be too good for hip-hop, these are them. The precision distracts from the vibe that is so important to hip-hop. The same thing happened when I tried a few other hip-hop songs like Hot Revolver by Lil’ Wayne, The Way I Are by Timbaland, and Diamonds from Sierra Leone by Kanye West. Maybe over time I will get used to the precision and won’t get distracted, but presently, I’m not sure I’d choose these headphones for hip-hop. Stereo Hearts by Gym Class Heroes and Without You by David Guetta don’t suffer the same fate. These songs don’t rely on bass as much as the other songs. And as such, they are fantastic for listening to with these cans. But these two songs aren’t so much as hip-hop. They are more dance-pop songs.There are so many other songs I’d like to cover like Sweet Child o’ Mine, Crazy Train, any live Clapton, anything David Bowie, Al Green, Marvin Gaye, Marley’s Redemption Song, Journey, Annie Lennox, Foo Fighters, Collective Soul, Linkin Park and so many more. But I think I’ll let you discover that for yourselves. I have never listened to a set of headphones that rival these. I’ve always leaned towards precision from my Hi-Fi equipment. Maybe it’s because I grew up playing instruments growing up, but I love hearing the instruments and voices in all their flawed glory. I love hearing a break in a voice, the strum of an acoustic, and the clatter of a hi-hat. These cans are truly for the sound-purist. What an amazing bargain at ~$200. Imagine what they will sound after 300 hours? I know…I can’t wait to find out. If you want to find out more about these headphones, post a comment and I’ll be sure to reply.

3. 

   Rated 4 out of 5

   champfriend – December 9, 2017

   Zum PC spielen
   Die Kopfhörer sind sehr Bequem, allerdings ändert sich der komfort nach ein paar Stunden und es drückt oben am Kopf wo der Bügel aufliegt(ich habe keine Haare). Des weiteren haben meine Ohren, die ich als Mittelgroß bezeichnen würde, minimalen Kontakt mit dem Schaumstoffpolster und der Abdeckung des Lautsprechers, was nach einiger Zeit auch unbequem wird. Evtl versuche ich mir aus visco Schaum größere Polster zu bauen.Ich bin von einem 28 € Headset auf diese Kopfhörer gewechselt und der erste Eindruck war: Da fehlt Bass^^ Kurz ins Windows getappt und Osu(so ein Musik Spiel) gestartet und siehe da, es fehlt kein Bass.Der Sound, in meinem Fall bei Destiny 2, ist soviel Klarer und genauer, das fällt einem schwer in Worte zu fassen. Man hört das plätschern von Bächen die in der nähe fliesen, man hört ein glasklares metallenes Scheppern der Geschosse die aus dem Automatikgewehr gefeuert werden mitsamt einem Echo das verzögert zurückhallt. Man hört die Geräusche seiner Schritte entsprechend der Oberfläche über die man läuft. Der Antrieb des Gleiters mit dem man rummfetzt knistert und zischt, die Düsen des Jetpacks die beim doppelsprung aktiviert werden sind leise zu hören.ich würde den Umstieg vone einem gewöhnlichen Gaming Headset auf Kopfhörer dieses Kalibers schon als Erlebnis bezeichnen, und ich hab mit HiFi nich viel am Hut.Das Kabel finde ich, entgegen einiger anderen bewertungen hier, absolut genial für an den Rechner, da meine anderen Headset Kabel immer 1,5m über den Schreibtisch verteilt liegen und sich verdrillern und verknoten^^Ein Stern Abzug wegen dem Komfort der sich beim längerem tragen am Stück zunehmend verabschiedet(ist bei der angeblich bequemeren Edition Variante genauso gewesen)Hier etwas ausführlicherIch habe bisher mit 28€ Creative Fatality pro Kopfhörern gespielt.Nach längerer Pause hab ich wieder angefangen häufiger zu zocken. Nach nächte langen Sessions drückten die Kopfhörer etwas unangenehm.Das Logitech G430 war grad für 35€ im Angebot also hab ich es mir geholt. Damit begann die Suche nach dem passenden Kopfhörer für mich.Folgende Kopfhörer habe ich anschliesend getestet:beyerdynamic DT 990 Edition 250 Ohm Hi-Fi- KopfhörerCorsair VOID PRO RGB WIRELESS Gaming Headset (PC, Wireless, Dolby 7.1) schwarzSennheiser Game Zero Special Edition schwarzCorsair VOID PRO SURROUND Gaming Headset (PC/PS4/XONE, USB/3,5mm, Dolby 7.1) rotSennheiser GAME ONE Gaming-Headset mit offener Akustik schwarzNun meine Erfahrungen:7.1 ist 100%iger Schrott. Vergleichbar mit Bildverbesserungen an Tvs bei Blu ray Wiedergabe. Die spiele geben Stereo sound für Kopfhörer so aus das man damit die Bestmögliche Ortung hat. Kann jeder selber testen, 7.1 am Kopfhörer einschalten die augen schliesen und nen kumpel ingame beauftragen, an bestimmten, um den eigenen charackter positionierten Stellen, Lärm zu produzieren. Mit 7.1 müsste das locker zu orten sein, bei meinemeinem Lautsprecher System im Wohnzimmer geht das auch ganz easy. Mit dem Kopfhörer hört man keinen Unterschied ob der andere Rechts vor oder Rechts hinter einem steht, es ist einfach rechts etwas leiser in beiden Fällen. Ich hab das sicher ne Stunde lang probiert und lag sogut wie nie richtig.Lautstärkeregler und Mikrofon Mute funktion braucht kein Schwein am PC. Die schalter und Drehregler an den Kabeln gehen nur Kaputt. Wenn ich da in manchen Bewertungen lese:”Die mute Funktion fürs Mikrofon ist super wenn man grad im Teamspek ist und die Mutter ins Zimmer kommt” könnt ich kotzen. Im Teamspeak und auch in jedem anderen Voice over ip Programm kann man das Mikro per hotkey muten! Ich hab voice Activation an und wenn mich meine Tochter oder Frau beim zocken belästigen dann drück ich die Taste + auf der Tastatur und das Mic is aus. Selbiges gilt für die Lautstärke. Erstens hat mitlerweile sogut wie jede Tastatur hotkeys für die Lautstärke und zweitens stellt man die lautstärke pro Game einmal ein und dann ändert man daran sogut wie nichts mehr.Stoffumantelte Kabel sind mega übel da der Stoff Geräusche, die am Kabel entstehen, sehr Laut in die Ohrmuschel übertragen. Bei mir reibt das Kabel immer etwas über den linken Arm, und das verursacht ein richtig lautes Geräusch, als würde jemand an der Ohrmuschel kratzen. Bei vielen headsets kann man das Kabel aber auch austauschen. Allerdings bietet in meinen Augen ein Stoffummanteltes Kabel keinen einzigen Vorteil. Zitat aus anderen Bewertungen:”Da macht es auch nichts wenn man mal mit dem Stuhl drüberfährt”… das kabel meines headsets liegt nie, und ich meine wirklich niemals, auf dem Boden. un mein bisheriges headset kostete 28€.Mikrofon Qualität hängt meiner meinung nach ganz stark vom voice over ip Programm ab. Im Teamspeak 3 war kein unterschied zwischen meinem 28€ headset und dem Sennheiser Game one Mikrofon festzustellen. Es waren beide absolut klar und ohne Hintergrundgeräusche zu verstehen. Die einzigen Mikrofone die bisher wirklich beschissen klingen im Teamspeak sind die von Steel Series Headsets.Da 90% der Pc Spieler das Mikro nur zur Kommunikation benutzen reicht aber selbst die qualität von besagten Steel Series headsets aus. Sie Klingen schlecht aber sind nicht nervig oder anstrengend für die andern Leute im Channel.Offen oder Geschlossen, das muss jeder selber wissen. Ich bevorzuge die offenen, da ich noch mitbekommen will wenn der Rauchmelder losgeht oder es an der Tür klingelt oder meine Tochter mich ruft. Außerdem ist es für mich die Hölle wenn ich im Teamspeak laber aber nicht höre wie laut ich spreche, wenn ich bei meinem Kumpel vorbeischau und er am zocken ist, dann hör ich ihn durch die ganze Wohnung brüllen wenn er sich normal im teamspeak mit seinen Jungs unterhält. Lüftergeräusche vom Rechner Lenken übrigens kein bischen vom spiel ab, man hört trotzdem jeden Schritt des Feindes^^ Und wenn einen irgendwelche Geräusche von außen stören, dann garantiere ich jedem zu 100% das wenn man den Lautstärkeregler behutsam aufdreht rein garnichts anderes mehr zu hören ist als der sound aus den Kopfhöhrern.Außerdem haben die Geschlossenen aus unerklärlichen Gründen bei mir einen sehr starken druck im Ohr erzeugt, sodass mir nach 4 stunden die Ohren innen mega weh getan haben(beim Sennheiser Game Zero). Bei den offenen hatte ich das nicht.Das Thema Onboard sound sehe ich im übrigen nicht so kritisch wie scheinbar alle anderen. Der Unterschied von normalen “Gammel Headsets” zu den DT990 ist riesig, allerdings ist der Unterschied von meinem 45€ Asus H81M-PLUS Mainboard mit ner Realtek Onboard Lösung zu einem häufig angepriesenen usb Kopfhörerverstärker ein Witz dagegen. Bei Qualitativ hochwertigen Audio Dateien kann man einen kleineren Unterschied warnehmen, aber ingame war für mich der Unterschied wirklich nur minimal. Ich bin absoluter HiFi Laie, aber ich denke das trifft auf so einige Gamer zu. Einen teuren Kopfhöhrer kann ich bedenkenlos weiterempfehlen, eine externe Soundkartenlösung würde ich mir erstmal nicht holen. Ich behalte den usb verstärker aber ebenfalls, da er eine geringe Verbesserung bringt und ich es mit meinen Rücksendungen auch nicht übertreiben will.Die Ohrpolster von allen getesteten Kopfhörern verursachten nach längerem Tragen gewisses unbehagen. Irgendwelche Stellen meiner Ohren haben immer Kontakt und selbst die ganz bequemen drücken irgendwann an den Kiefer oder Schädelknochen. Ich schätze aber mal das das bei nutzungszeiten von 4 oder 5 stunden aufwärts anscheinend normal ist. Allerdings erwarte ich bei “over ear” Design das die Polster übers Ohr gehen ohne es zu berühren.Die Kopfbügel bei allen getesteten Kopfhöhrern verursachten mir auf meiner Glatze nach gewisser Zeit ebenfalls ein Leicht Schmerzhaftes Gefühl. Evtl bin ich einfach empfindlich geworden mit den Jahren, aber mein altes creative Fatality pro hs-800 ist bequemer als alle getesteten Kopfhörer. Allerdings ist der Klang in keinster Weise ein Vergleich.Nun die Ausscheidungsgründe der anderen Headsets/Kopfhöhrer:Die beiden Corsair waren sehr Bequem, allerdings spielen die vom Klang her ein Paar Ligen unter Beyerdynamics und Sennheiser. Eine Software für Kopfhörer installieren zu müssen find ich außerdem behindert^^ bei den Wireless ist es vermutlich nicht auf anderem Wege lösbar.Anstatt 7.1 Dreck mit einzubauen hätten sie Lieber ein paar Euro mehr in die lautsprecher investiert.Die G430 von Logitech haben nach einer Weile unangenehm gedrückt und der Klang war auch nicht vergleichbar mit Sennheiser/beyerdynamics, Die sind eher auf dem level meines Creative Fatality Headsets. Sie haben nur 35€ gekostet und sind daher aber auch ganz anderst zu bewerten. Meiner Tochter haben sie gefallen und sie benutzt sie jetzt. sie funktionieren auch ohne irgendwelche Software als Stereo headset.Das Sennheiser Game Zero Special Edition hatte die bequemsten Polster von allen, allerdings ist es komplett geschlossen was mir definitv nicht zusagt und es verursachte sehr schmerzhaften Druck in meinem Ohr nachdem ich es um die 4 Stunden auf hatte.Das beyerdynamics Dt990 Edition hatte ich erst rausgepickt, dann jedoch gesehen das die Pro version ein ganzes Stück billiger ist. Der Komfortunterschied ist für mich nicht auszumachen. Es sitzt zu locker auf meinem kopf aber verursacht trotzdem nach einigen Stunden unbehagen. Außerdem find ich, anscheinend entgegen aller anderen User, das Telefonstyle Kabel auf meinem Schreibtisch mega Praktisch.Das Sennheiser Game One war nach meinen anfänglichen Recherchen die erste Wahl, zumal es zum fast gleichen Preis ein Mikrofon dabei hat und ich nicht irgendwas drankleben muss. Der Klang im vergleich zum DT990 wirkt aber Dumpfer. An der Onboard soundkarte ist mir beim zocken kein Unterschied aufgefallen, da man das Headset aber umstecken muss und dadurch kurz keinen Sound auf den Ohren hat, ist es für HiFi Laien wie mich echt schwer unterschiede zu hören. Mit einem Usb Kopfhörerverstärker war dann aber in Destiny 2 ein geringer Unterschied zu erkennen. Bei Hochwertigen audio Dateien konnte man es dann schon deutlicher hören. Es wirkt im direkten Vergleich so als würde eine dünne Schaumstoffschicht zwischen Ohr und Lautsprecher liegen die alles etwas gedämpft klingen lässt im vergleich zum DT990.An meinen Av Receiver angeschlossen mit der Blu ray “King Arthur Legend of the Sword”, die ich jedem nur empfehlen kann, erkennt man allerdings einen gewaltigen Unterschied zwischen den beiden Kopfhörern. evtl ist das Game one Niederohmiger da es für den Pc konstruiert wurde und daher kommt der Unterschied, aber ich kann euch versichern das das Game one in dieser Situation richtig beschissen geklungen hat im vergleich zum DT990. Das game one hatte weniger Bass und alles klang viel zu hoch, so das bei der von mir getesteten Lautstärke schon fast schmerzhaft in den Ohren war. In reviews zum Game One wird gesagt das es den Sound unverfälscht wiedergibt, allerdings bin ich mir zu 100% sicher das die Leute die die Blu ray abgemischt haben es nicht so gemacht haben wie ich es über das Game One gehört habe.Nun Das DT990 proDas Kabel find ich genial. Normal schlängeln sich immer gefühlte 1,5 m Headset Kabel über meinen Tisch. Es reicht gut über den tisch an meinen Kopf und ich kann mich noch zurücklehnen ohne das es sich verlängern muss. Es ist nicht Stoffummantelt was zu einer erheblichen Reduzierung der Reibungsgeräusche in der linken Ohrmuschel führt. Man kann es leider nicht einfach an der Ohrmuschel ausstecken wie beim Game One, das finde ich Schade da ein eventueller Austausch sich aufwendiger gestaltet.Keine Lautstärkeregler integriert ist ebenfalls ein gewaltiger Vorteil wasdie Haltbarkeit angeht. Es gibt zu hauf berichte im Netz über das Game One und defekte an der ach so praktischen Lautstärkeregelung (könnte aber auch fake sein um das Game One schlecht dastehen zu lassen).Aufjedenfall kann ich den Windows Lautstärkeregler mehrere Milliarden mal hin und herschieben und der einzige verschleis findet an den Slide pads meiner Maus statt^^Es ist offen, also kann ich in normaler Lautstärke im teamspeak reden(Teamspeak regelt die Lautstärke eh, deshalb ist es weniger für die Leute im channel nervig als für die Leute im selben Haus^^)Es ist um einiges komfortabler als das Game One, was wirklich sehr stramm sitzt. Beim Game one habe ich Außerdem ziemlich großflächigen Kontakt meiner Ohren mit dem Polster da sie echt schmal geraten sind. Beim Dt990 ist der kontakt minimal, allerdings nach längerer zeit auch unangenehm spürbar.Leider muss ich mir ein Mikrofon dran Basteln, aus Preislichen gründen kann ich jedem der das mic nur für Voicechat nutzt nur von der verlockenden AntLion Lösung abraten, da wie gesagt von den Leuten im Teamspeak kein unterschied Zwischen einem 5 Jahre alten 28€ Headset und dem scheinbar besten Headset Mikrofon überhaupt vom Game One aufgefallen ist.Von allen getesteten Kopfhöreren hatte das Dt990 den besten Klang und ist mein neuer “Gaming Kopfhörer” ich betreibe es mit einem Usb Kopfhörerverstärker für 74€Ich kann nur jedem der viel zockt raten mal so einen etwas teureren Kopfhörer zu testen, denn die Spiele Entwickler geben sich anscheinend extrem viel mühe mit dem Sound der Spiele und mit den Standart gammel gaming headset nimmt man nichtmal einen bruchteil Der Geräuschskulisse war.Ein Kopfhörer den ich mir nächstes Jahr noch anschauen werde wenn mein Freund aus den USA ihn mir mitbringt ist der Audio Technica ATH-AD700X. Der Kostet allerdings auf Amazon.com nichtmal den Halben € Preis von hier in US$.Der sieht nämlich wirklich bequem aus^^

4. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   PL – January 26, 2022

   990s for home use – compared with 880s, 770s and Amirons
   Just received these this afternoon. I already own Amirons, DT 880s and DT 770s and Grado SR80s. I’m not a fan of Sennheiser, so anyone who is familiar with both Beyerdynamic and Sennheiser headphones will appreciate that this is a subjective review by someone who likes Beyerdynamic’s house sound. This review is my assessment of them purely for home use.There are obviously loads of reviews of the 990s on the internet, and although very popular they obviously divide opinion. I shan’t make out that these are for everybody, but I’ll add my three pennies worth here which might cut through the superlative laden ayes and the damning nays and help some people to make up their minds on whether or not to buy a pair (I dithered for far too long).When I was in my early twenties I might have found the Beyerdynamic sound too bright and analytical, but back then I could hear frequencies up to 20khz; not so now, at 63 my hearing tops out just under 14khz, so maybe this accounts for my later-in-life infatuation with the Beyerdynamic sound. Though I like most forms of music, the bulk of my collection veers towards acoustic music – classical, jazz etc – there’s also a fair bit of dub reggae, rock, EDM and so on (so, it’s basically Prince Far-I to Schubert, Aphex Twin to CSNY, Thelonious Monk to Joni Mitchell, Public Enermy to Spirit, Poppy Ackroyd to Bob Dylan – catholic, essentially).I’ve only had a few hours to make comparisons (Bill Withers, Thelonious Monk, Radio 3, Bill Charlap, Heart of the Congos, Lana Del Rey), but I think this has given me adequate opportunity to make a pretty accurate judgement of the characteristics and comparative merits of the 990s. I’ve been listening to them mainly through a Little Dot Mk 2 with a combination of Novosibirsk and Mullard 8100 valves (sourcing from a Cyrus Cd and Cyrus 8 DAC amplifier).I’m delighted with the 990s. They are neither shriekingly sibilant nor either lacking or over-endowed with bass. Compared to the other headphones that I own I would say that the 990s are nearest in sound to the 880s. Indeed, I think that they are very near sound-wise. The 880s are marginally more polished, but the difference (to my ears at least) is subtle rather than dramatic. I would suggest that the 990s are very good, cheaper alternatives to the 880s. The 880s clamp the head noticeably more lightly than the 990s, but the 990s are more secure on the head. Sound leakage is similar in both, so neither are good for listening to next to your sleeping partner (who hates going off to music and especially hates jazz) in bed unless you want a poke in the ribs. For this I have the 770s, which have a somewhat “fuller” or “fatter” sound than the other two. Leakage on the 770s is minimal at low to modest volumes.The Amirons (Homes) are, to my mind, decidedly more “musical” or “liquid” sounding headphones, very enjoyable for extended listening and very revealing, in comparison with those I would describe the 990s and 880s as rather “analytical” sounding and the 770s are somewhat “dryer” (I hope describing their sound as both “dryer” and “fatter” doesn’t sound like a contradiction in terms but I can’t immediately think of a better words to describe the sound). However, they’re all good and all have what you might call a “house sound” (i.e. a Beyerdynamic sound), although the Amirons depart furthest from this sound (which isn’t really very far at all) while the others might all be considered even more typical. The Amirons have a fuller, certainly pleasant and, I would say, slightly coloured bass by comparison, the bass on the 880s and 990s is leaner and, as far as I am qualified to judge, seemingly more accurate. Some people say that they both lack bass, but I don’t think this it true, it is most certainly there when it’s there! It may be that those who think they lack bass are listening to these headphones without suitable amplification. As goes the 770s, I’d say that their bass – in terms of weight – lies in the middle here, it is perfectly good but it is neither as accurate as on the 880s and 990s nor as pleasurable as on the Amirons.Sound stage is best, and very similar, on the 990s, 880s and Amirons. I wouldn’t say that there is any vastly significant difference here between these three headphones. The 770s, being closed-back, are noticeably more “closed-in” in terms of soundstage but, in terms of closed-back headphones per se they’re actually really rather good in this area; I’ve certainly not encountered a closed-back pair that are better (or indeed any other closed-back pair that I can actually bear – I personally much prefer open-back designs, for me the 770s are exceptions in this department). The 1770s may well be better, but I’m not about to fork out several hundred pounds more for those when I use closed-back headphones mostly for listening in bed via the headphone output of a Roberts radio.As regards comparison with the Grado SR 80s, the 990s and 880s are decidedly superior sounding, with the Grados sounding rather rough and uncouth by comparison (though this isn’t helped by the Grados comfort levels which are simply not in the same league – half an hour with Grado SR80 ear pads is sheer torture; consequently I’ve replaced them with Sennheiser HD414 ear pads which improbably (as, apart from being yellow, they don’t seem materially that different from the Grado pads) improve matters a fair bit and don’t noticeably change the SR80s sound). The Grados do sound more bassy, but this is definitely a matter of quantity rather than quality. Build quality on the Grado SR80s is also markedly inferior to that of the Beyerdynamics. I would retire the Grados at this point, but their 32 Ohm impedance makes them useful. They’re good fun, but they’re not good for extended listening sessions.The 990s and 880s with their 250 Ohm impedance definitely need amplification. I use a couple of Little Dot Mk 2s. The Amirons have the same impedance but are significantly more sensitive. For unamplified use I find the 770s a better match with their 80 Ohm impedance (they certainly work well with most Roberts radios of recent years, Roberts seem to have pretty good headphone circuits on their radios).Summing up, I think that the 990s are fantastic value for money (the Amiron Homes, which I love, are perhaps a clear case of diminishing returns by comparison). If you’re thinking of buying a pair of Beyerdynamics, want open-backed headphones, fancy the 880s from all you’ve read, but feel that the 880s are a stretch for you financially, then I think you’d be missing very little with the 990s in terms of sound).Originally, I had thought of purchasing Beyerdynamic’s new DT900 X headphones, but – reading the reviews, and knowing how much I already liked the sound of the 880s and 770s – I thought I’d save myself some money and get something that might not sound so hugely different for half the price and, beyond that, I actually prefer the look of the 990s. I don’t rule out considering the new series in future, but for now I don’t feel I’m missing out on anything that would be game-changing, although I admit I’m curious. As I have found repeatedly, however wild the superlatives I encounter in the reviews the actual differences between the last and the latest model of a particular piece of hifi is more often than not a matter of nuance.Whatever way you cut it, comparing the 990s with the highly regarded and (to me) very similar sounding 880s and the more refined, more relaxed, but four or five times more expensive Amiron Homes, they are still very good sounding headphones and first class value for money – assuming, like me, you like the Beyerdynamic sound. If you’re a Sennheiser fan you’d probably be barking up the wrong tree (but you know that already) and, if you’re a Beats fan, then presumably you’re already stone deaf. And then again, as goes highly regarded budget headphones, I reckon they knock the Grado SR80s into a cocked hat. But not everyone would agree with me.Anyway, I hope all that helps.Update, 28/1/22. I’ve now spent some more time listening to the 990s on a Little Dot Mk 2 with a combination of Novosibirsk and Radio Technique valves (sourcing from a Naim CD5 via a Rega Elex R). The Radio Technique valves are very similar to the Mullard 8100s I used at the top of this piece. Continued close listening has only confirmed my sense of how good these headphones are. On further consideration, with this set up, I’d say their sound signature lies between that of the 880s and the Amirons. I’d say they sound slightly “weightier” than the 880s and that the Amirons are a bit more so, but the differences here are more subtle than seismic. On careful comparison, after a few hours of listening, my overwhelming sense at this point is that, if you like open-backed headphones, like the Beyerdynamic sound and have a hankering for a pair of Amirons but either can’t afford them or can’t justify the expense, then you really wouldn’t be missing very much at all by just settling for a pair of 990s. By comparison they are a real bargain and, I think, in absolute terms they are quite simply one of the best bargains there is on the headphone market.One further point, on comfort, although the 990s have more clamping force on the head, I actually find them more comfortable than the Amirons as they fit my head better.Finally, as anyone who has read this far has already probably figured out, it has cost me quite a lot to reach my conclusions here. I think I have a reasonable sense of humour, but if you’re an audiophile sceptic then I guess I can understand why you may feel you’re getting the last laugh! I’m glad I own the Amirons, they are very nice headphones, but if I could only have one pair I must admit that I’d very happily settle for the 990s.Postscript, 31/1/22. On further reflection, it’s very good having several headphones all sharing a general character that I like, but each a little different from the others. Different music works best on certain headphones (for instance, listening to Beatrice Rana’s performance of the Goldberg Variations this morning I much prefer the rendition of her piano’s sound through the Amirons to that of the 770s (the piano sounding decidedly more lifelike through the Amirons), whereas with Thelonious Monk’s It’s Monk’s Time the difference is less obvious and, if anything, I’d say I actually prefer the 770s with their greater attack. But, different music is not all: different recordings, different source equipment, different mood of the listener … however, it’s very quick and easy to change between modestly priced headphones during a listening session in order to optimise your listening experience (something you can’t readily do with expensive speakers, amplifiers, cartridges and so on).

5. 

   Rated 3 out of 5

   α – February 8, 2020

   Un casque frustrant
   Je tient a précisé qu’après un petit tant d’adaptation et de rodage de 2 semaines je refait entièrement mon avis qui rabaissé trop celui ci.Comparé a un Audio Technica M50x et un Hyper x Cloud Alpha sur les styles suivant : K-pop / J-pop / Metal / Rock / Vocaloid / Electro et OST d’animation japonaise je vais décrire point par point !Tout d’abord parlons du packaging qui est légèrement bof pour un casque aussi bon et sensée être pro mais il n’a rien de casser donc ça va !Le confort ! si vous êtes extrêmement sensible a la chauffe et que vous transpirer beaucoup des oreilles se casque n’est peut être pas fait pour vous , mais il est d’un confort !!! comment osé dire qu’il est inconfortable ??? je ne comprend pas vraiment pas c’est un véritable coussin en velours ! ( car les coussiné sont en velours ) , peut être une légère pression au début du le haut-coté du crane mais rien d’anormal ! c’est le temps qu’il se fasse un peu.Bon le son !!! la partie la plus importante alors qu’est-ce que sa dit après 2 semaines de rodage ?Alors on y croit ou pas , rodage ou adaptation des oreilles ? je n’en sais rien mais le son a légèrement changer , il est moins froid , moins terne et les basse et grave ressorte mieux.Sinon dans l’ensemble et dans l’utilisation je vais décrire chaque style avec mon impression ! tester sur du MP3 youtube très compresser , sur du 320kbps , du 1800kbps en Flac 16 bits en terminant sur du Flac 24 bit a 4700kbps donc je peut comparé l’ensemble et me faire un avis très détaillé.Brancher sur un pc avec carte son offrant un jusqu’à 600 OHM c’est fort mais il lui faut beaucoup de jus a se petit ! et sur une carte mère classique de pc tour ou même portable n’y penser même pas le son ne sera pas assez détaillé et puissant ( même sur smartphone bien entendus )On y viens :Instrumental pop / Classique / OST ( aucune voix ) : Qu’elle plaisir !!! ahlala…enfin une scène sonore et une spatialisation digne de mes plus gros fichier flac ! sur de l’instru c’est un *rgasme auditif ! on entend absolument tout ! , aucun effet caverneux même sur du MP3 c’est même bizarre haha !Metal / Rock : Alors pour se coter la il y’a un MAIS comme vous l’avez pu le voir dans le titre je parle de frustration , car se casque est atteint de sibilance , il sibile dans les voix et uniquement dans les voix , j’ai constater un pic a 9000 Khz et 10.000 Khz….impossible a calibré correctement sinon on perd des détails dans l’instrumentale derrière mais j’ai quand même baisser de 4 cran les 10.000Khz et et de 2 les 9000 Khz sur l’équaliser “PEACE EQUALISER” , sa se traduit par une musique qui sibile moins et beaucoup plus plate mais qui reste écoutable ! , sa manque cependant peut être un peu de dynamisme ! ( la version fermer sera surement mieux pour se style de musique ) mis a pars sa c’est assez détaillé ( voir un peut trop par moment ) et sa respire c’est le principale , aucune distorsion et écouter du metal / rock sans distorsion je peux vous dire que c’est très agréable ! on ne pourra pas cependant écouter du metal / rock a haut volume sur se casque ( Mes groupes de test sont Avenged Sevenfold / Breaking Benjamin / Smash it Combo etc… )J-pop / K-pop / OST : Dynamique correcte mais sans plus , spatialisation remarquable avec des voix bien resitué , aucune surprise a se niveaux la même si un peu plus de basse serais apprécié et des aigu trop mis en avant…donc re-bonjour la sibilance !! , du coup encore a devoir ré-activé l’équaliser se qui en conclu par perte de détails mais des voix qui ne siffle plus dans les oreilles , a la longue c’est fatiguant , très fatiguant et le passage a l’équaliser est obligatoire si vous monter a plus de 50% de volume windows qui est un volume selon moi assez moyens , mais dans le fond en comparaisons avec un audio-technica m50x qui devrais être plus habitué a se type de musique est bien…le Beyerdynamic est quand même bien supérieur !! la spatialisation et les voix ne sonne pas comme une boite de conserve style caverneux ! et sa c’est cool , mais la encore je pense que la version fermer pour se style de musique apportera beaucoup mieux.Electro pop japonaise : Sur des titres comme Bubble Tea de “Dark Cat” c’est ultra propre , que se soit les aigu , le bruit de fond , les graves TOUT ! pas de sibilance remarquer sur se style de musiques ( bizarre ) , je doit également parler des titres de Yuc’e !!! ( pour ceux qui connaisse bien entendus ) c’est juste incroyable , on a l’impression d’être dans le mix , d’être dans la musique , a se prix cette sensation est incroyable , la spatialisation est in-cro-yable !!Cependant j’ai remarquer qu’ils se comporte mieux sur des musiques calmes ou quand les musiques sont des instru , le son est moins “fouillis” mais se n’est qu’un détails , le défaut de sibilance est en effet frustrant et je vais me procuré le DT 770 PRO 80 ohm ( car ma carte son n’apprécie pas trop le 250 ohm apparemment ) pour faire une comparaison et si la sibilance n’est plus la ou du moins plus faible je prendrais avec plaisir le DT 770 PRO !Si par contre vous n’entendez plus très bien les aigu très fin ou les sibilantes vers 10.000khz vous pouvez foncez , c’est vrais que pour certains ou certaines qui aurais une audition un peu faible vers se cotre la du spectre et bien je pense que c’est le casque parfait pour vous qui allie détails , spatialisation , prix correcte avec une assez bonne polyvalence.Mais mon avis ne s’arrête pas la !Personnellement moi écoutant beaucoup de J-pop/ k-pop et instru japonaise je reste un peu sur ma faim a devoir trituré souvent l’equaliser car chaque musique est différente car OUI ! se casque n’est absolument pas neutre ! il a une forte coloration dans les aigu comme dit précédemment alors si vous voulez vous en servir pour crée de la musique attention ! a mon avis se n’est pas adapté car vous allez baissé trop d’aigu dans votre mix en pensant qu’il y en a trop dans votre musique mais il n’en est rien , c’est juste le casque qui les reproduit trop en avant !Donc en suis-je satisfait ? Oui et non , d’une part une est excellent et bof sur certains titre haha c’est assez hilarant mais je décide de prendre sont frère pour comparé on verra bien et je ferais un retour d’expérience après tout sa !Mais pourquoi je le préfère a d’autres casque ? oui car je possède un M50x et un HyperX Cloud Alpha !Sachiez que je me permet de le comparé alors que je suis conscient qu’il n’a rien avoir avec des casque fermer mais tout de même , sur les styles instrumental ( Ost d’animation japonaise ou même sur des instru électronique pop et du classique style violon/cello ) le Beyer est bien supérieur au deux autres !! par contre le Hyper x le dépasse sur les styles moderne ( jpop , kpop , electro a fort dynamisme avec des voix mise en avant ) et oui oui ! moi même étant bluffé par le résultat mais le Hyper x a montré un parfait équilibre sur les styles rythmé et moderne sans aucune sibilance a la limite de la neutralité , par contre l’audio technica bien que se ne sois pas le sujet je vous invite a constater mon avis a se propos d’ailleurs ! il s’est montrer caverneux et médiocre devant mon DT 990 PRO et mon HyperXSi vous voulez donc un casque polyvalent pour un prix ridicule vous avez le Hyper x Cloud alpha qui s’adaptera très bien aux musiques moderne , cependant si vous voulez du détails avec un pic vers l’aigu si vos musiques en sont peu pourvus vous pouvez tenter !PS : Je suis passer sur un DT 770 PRO 80 ohm édition et celui ci est 3 fois mieux , un peu plus de bass , un peu plus de dynamisme dans le metal et le rock et surtout un aigu moins agressif mais tout autant détaillé.

6. 

   Rated 5 out of 5

   R. Wolf – September 16, 2023

   Critical listening
   Ich habe mir diesen Kopfhörer als Hauptgerät zum Einsatz für Gaming, einfach mal so zum Musik hören und zum Produzieren und Mastern gekauft. Vorher habe ich das Klangbild mit denen der 770 und 880 verglichen, wobei mir dieser Kopfhörer trotz offener Bauweise am besten gefiel. Der Sound ist klar und hell, für Gaming evtl. hier problematisch. Der Bass ist satt, nicht überbetont, aber dennoch potent, auch bei tieferen Frequenzbändern. Insgesamt hatte ich mit diesen Kopfhörern den Eindruck, dass ich zum ersten Mal alle Frequenzen in meinem Mix wahrnehmen kann.Die Verarbeitungsqualität ist gut, leider viel Plastik, doch der Kopfhörer wirkt sehr wertig. Zudem ist er auch über längere Sessions super bequem. Die Ohrpolster lassen sich austauschen, da habe ich gleich welche mitbestellt. Ein Manko ist das nicht abnehmbare Kabel, wofür man dann auf eine teurere “Edition” des 990 zurückgreifen muss.Insgesamt hält das Gerät, was sogar die Packung verspricht. Dieser Kopfhörer ist für critical listening gedacht. Allerdings ist er meiner Meinung nach vielseitig einsetzbar, wenn man den Sound mag.